On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 06:11:42PM +0100, Abe Timmerman wrote: > Op een regenachtige winterdag (Thursday 26 December 2002 23:21), schreef > Jarkko Hietaniemi: > > > Just for the case of argument, here's the patch updated to use the > > fp == PL_rsfp test instead. There is one existing test that actually > > will fall on its face if this src vs data distinction is not made: > > lib/Pod/t/eol.t. If nothing else comes from this patch, at least > > the new test, t/comp/eol.t, should be of some use. > > I ran a smoke with this patch (eol.pat.v3) applied to 18354 on Win2000 (gcc > 3.2) and it fails test 2 of t/comp/eol.t: Further proof that it's a good thing I titled the message [DRAFT PATCH]. Scratch that draft. -- Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. It is 'dead'." -- Jack CohenThread Previous | Thread Next